Senate Suspends Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan for Six Months Following Sexual Harassment Accusation Against Akpabio
In a dramatic turn of events at the Nigerian Senate, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has been suspended for six months following her accusation of sexual harassment against Senate President Godswill Akpabio. The decision, which has sparked public debate, was reached on Thursday after deliberations by the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Code of Conduct.
The controversy began when Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan publicly alleged that Akpabio had sexually harassed her, a claim that led to tensions within the legislative chamber. In response, the Senate ruled that she had violated its Standing Rules by bringing both the presiding officer and the entire Senate into public disrepute.
Senate’s Verdict and Natasha’s Defiance
While some lawmakers attempted to reduce the suspension period to three months, the Senate ultimately upheld the six-month suspension through a majority vote. Senate President Akpabio, reading the committee’s recommendations, stated:
“That the Senate do suspend Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan for six months for her total violation of the Senate Standing Rules (2023 as amended) for bringing the presiding officer and the entire Nigerian Senate to public opprobrium.”
However, the Senate left the door open for reconsideration, stating that the suspension could be lifted or reduced if Akpoti-Uduaghan tenders a formal written apology to the Senate.
“For the Senate to consider lifting this suspension or reducing the tenure of the suspension, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan shall submit a written apology to the Senate before her reconsideration by the Nigerian Senate,” Akpabio declared.
Despite this ruling, Akpoti-Uduaghan remained defiant. As she was escorted out of the chambers by the Sergeant-At-Arms, she boldly declared:
“This injustice will not be sustained.”
Public Reactions and Political Implications
The suspension of Akpoti-Uduaghan has fueled widespread reactions, with many questioning whether the decision was a fair application of legislative discipline or a suppression of a critical voice within the Senate. Critics argue that rather than addressing the core issue of sexual harassment, the Senate focused on silencing a lawmaker who dared to speak out.
This incident also raises broader concerns about gender dynamics, power structures, and accountability within Nigeria’s political system. For many Nigerians, Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension is not just about Senate rules—it is about whether women in power can speak up against alleged misconduct without facing institutional backlash.
As the dust settles, the big question remains: Will Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan apologize, or will she stand her ground and challenge the Senate’s decision?
One thing is certain—this political storm is far from over.
